The majority of my anger, however, is aimed at what I call a culture of fear. Thanks to the breast cancer awareness movement we are aware; very aware. If you are a woman, you have breasts and you’ve thought about breast cancer. (Admit it). But the media only presents sound bites, and as a result a woman hears the word “cancer” and immediately thinks “mastectomy.” In fact, there is a concern among the medical community that women are having unnecessary mastectomies. According to the Mayo Clinic ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) “is considered a precancerous lesion,” which means it is a risk factor. It is not yet breast cancer but could become breast cancer if it goes untreated. (Similar to colon polyps; if they are not removed they will turn into colon cancer). However, women who are diagnosed with DCIS are having mastectomies.
As for preventative mastectomies, I don’t know. My reaction is quite negative. After all, would you cut off your finger if you got a hang nail because it might get infected? I feel as if the message is the same. You are a woman. You have breasts. Therefore you might get breast cancer. So, you should have a double mastectomy to ward of the possibility of something that is statistically unlikely.
In the end, Ms. Jolie’s decision was personal
and nobody’s business. But because she is a celebrity it is everyone’s
business. Shame on us for intruding. But more to the point, shame on those who
continue to promote a culture of fear.
If you enjoy my blog and would like to follow me on FaceBook, I can be found at The Reluctant Survivor.
Well thought out. We should not be victims of fear. Information is key.
ReplyDeleteHeather,
ReplyDeleteInteresting perspective that you share. You know why I was angry about the hub-a-loo? Because I feel that by Ms. Jolie going public, she is capitalizing on her notoriety in the guise of affecting change. I feel this denegrades the difficult struggle that other women... everyday, regular women who have HAD to have mastectomies for active breast cancer have faced. They do not benefit from being in the public eye, do they? Those women are MY heroes.
I get that Angelina Jolie is trying to affect change, but isn't she really just making herself look good? Is affecting change the REAL reason behind her going public or was it her FEAR of having a private moment made public the true reason? One will never truly know.
Either way....great food for thought.
Lynn Spiro
Lynn Spiro & Company
www.lynnspiro.com
Professional Organizing for your Home & Business